Blogging about forensic accounting, my life, and anything else I feel warrants it. Disclaimer: Anything found on this site is not intended to be professional advice. If you are in need of professional advice, please contact a professional to give it.
It Doesn't Mean What They Want It To
Published on September 21, 2012 By Jythier In Religion

The government’s got it wrong.

For a while now, there has been a push to redefine what freedom of religion means.  Freedom of religion comes from the following:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Here’s what people seem to think it says:

Congress shall not let anybody holding public office exercise their religion.  Anybody who works for the government cannot exercise their religion during work hours.  All exercise of religion outside of strictly religious organizations is prohibited.   Government money cannot go to any religious organization, even if it provides a service better or cheaper than the government could provide.

What I’m saying is that the violation of the Constitution wasn’t when we had the Ten Commandments at the court house.  It was when we removed them.

Now we have the issue of the prayer before starting a public meeting.  Everybody on the committee agrees with it, but people who aren’t involved are up in arms about it because it brings religion into government. You know what?  Those are people in the government.  And the law doesn’t say they need to stop praying.  The law says that you, concerned citizen, cannot stop them from praying.  That’s unconstitutional for you to do.

There’s a bunch of backwards rules that are coming out of the justice system because they can’t even read a document that spells it out clearly.  The very law of our nation that is supposed to keep the government from being able to stop us from praying, celebrating, and exercising our religion has been misinterpreted to mean that they MUST stop us.

I would urge any Christian specifically, because most of this seems to apply only to us, to fight back in two ways.  One, don’t let them trample on your rights.  Two, don’t trample on the rights of other religious groups.  If a Muslim wants to pray, too, that’s HIS right and you shouldn’t stop him, either.   Show the world that it is religious persecution against the Christians instead of just a societal struggle to eliminate all religion from public life.  If it’s not, we’re going to end up in the same place as the other religions.  But what it feels like, is that we’re going to end up with a country that doesn’t allow Christianity, but allows every other religion.  I hope I’m wrong.


Comments (Page 10)
10 PagesFirst 8 9 10 
on Apr 05, 2013

DESADE666
2. And you do realise, do you not, that each and every soldier in the German army had a 'God on Our Side' motto on their belts? That Hitler was a Catholic? That he explicitly stated in 'Mein Kampf' that he felt a duty to the Lord to kill the Jews? That Hitler's first treaty was with Rome? That the Catholic churches in Germany celebrated Hitler's birthday each year. That the Roman Catholic church did not speak out against the holocaust? That the hatred of Jews has its origin in the shameful portrayal in the Christian Bible? National Socialism itself was steeped in old Nordic traditions and Norse Gods. But even if as you appear to suggest Hitler orchestrated genocide because he was a atheist (and he was never excommunicated by the Catholic Church so officially he was a Catholic if a non-practising one to the end) none of this excuses what was done in the name of God throughout the course of human history.

Using Hitler to slam religion, especially Catholicism, just doesn't work.  

You wrote that religion poisons everything, is a con racket, da, da, da....enough to convince anyone reading this that you are anti-religion. Don't you know that Hitler's Table Talk, his own revealing collection of personal writings, shows him to be rabidly anti-religion? He called Christianity one of the great "scourges" of history, and wanted the German people to be "immunized against this disease". He promised that "through the peasantry we shall be able to destroy Christianity".   He blamed the Jews for inventing Christianity and scorned Christian values. His leading advisors, Goebbels, Himmler, Heydrich, and Bormann were Atheists who hated religion and sought to eradicate its influence from Germany.

Doesn't that seem to make you and Hitler "birds of a feather" at least when it comes to being anti-religion?

Yes, Hitler was a Catholic in his childhood years, but he apostatized from the Faith. Whether or not he was formally excommunicated is still under debate.

DESADE666
2. ... That Hitler's first treaty was with Rome? ....That the Roman Catholic church did not speak out against the holocaust?

I will answer these charges, but won't belabor the point beyond this as this is not my thread. All I ask is, instead of slinging out unjust charges please read both sides. Until you do, please stop blaming the CC and Catholicism for the wrong doing of secular regimes.

To get the facts on the Vatican-Nazi Concordat of 1933, one must read, THE PERSECUTION OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IN THE THIRD REICH: FACTS AND DOCUMENTS, published in 1941 at the height of Nazi tyranny. The appendix is the full text of the concordat. It proves with authentic and incontrovertible facts that beyond a shadow of doubt the Catholic Church condemned Hitler and his ideology, loudly, repeatedly, and from the very beginning of his rise to power. For this, he tormented, repressed and killed Catholics. Another good book on the CC under Hitler is THE NAZI PERSECUTION OF THE CHURCHES by JD Conway, 1968.


The following is a brief explanation of the signing of the Concordat. In 1920, Hitler laid the foundation for overthrowing the Versailles Treaty by converting the German Workers’ Party into the Nationalist Socialist’s German Workers’ Party (NSDAP). In 1923, while in prison for 8 months, he compiled notes for Mein Kampf. His aim was to supplant faith in Christianity by faith in national socialism. Once this goal was attained, he hoped to annihilate the Catholic Church as an institution. In the elections of 1932 and 33, German bishops warned Catholics against this movement, and urged them to vote for Catholic candidates and forbade them to vote for the Nazis. In Jan. 1933, Hitler became chancellor of the Third Reich and affirmed Germany’s traditional foundations by asserting that his government regarded Catholicism and Protestantism as the most important factors for support of the German ethos and would devote itself to cooperation between church and state.
He seemed to be fulfilling these promises when he concluded a concordat with the Holy See on July 20, 1933 that permitted free, public exercise of religious freedom. He lied. Hitler’s violations of its provisions were so numerous that in 1937 Pius XI issued the encyclical, Mit brennender Sorge, which made clear the fundamental irreconcilability of Catholicism and Nazism. It protested the closing and confiscation of Catholic schools, hospitals and seminaries, the seizure of property and goods belonging to the religious orders, the discrediting of religious by means of rigged trials, and the identifying of loyalty to Christianity with disloyalty to the fatherland. In pastoral letters and sermons, the German hierarchy forcefully opposed racism, totalitarianism, euthanasia laws, compulsory membership in Hitler’s youth organizations, and the desecration of churches.

For more info on "Hitler's first treaty" please Google: Sister Margherita Marchione, of the Religious Teachers Filippini, a historian and expert on the life of Pius XII. She and other notables have laid out unequivicaly that, yes, Cardinal Pacelli signed a Concordat with Germany that promised religious freedoms. It lasted 5 days before Hitler broke every promise, starting with abolishing the Catholic Youth Movement and forbidding Catholic newspapers and visible Church activity. For that, the Concordat was nullified and not worth the paper it was printed on, and Hitler who had long apostatized from the Faith used the state as a club against Catholicism.

DESADE666
2. And you do realise, do you not...That the Roman Catholic church did not speak out against the holocaust? .

I don’t know whether this is of ignorance, outright prejudice or you just blindly following the media which is so little interested in historical truth particularly when it involves the CC. In any case, your comments are completely unfounded, untrue and unjust.

Sister Margherita Marchione wrote, “Crusade of Charity: Pius XII and POW’s (PaulistPress). She says there are 20 million wartime letters in the Vatican Archives that express the faith and confidence of families with regard to their loved ones who were prisoners of war or missing in action. She said that he saved hundreds of thousands of Jews from the gas chambers. She also says there are thousands of available documents in the Archives that record the humanitarian work of the Holy See, including his rescue program that with diplomacy rather than confrontation saved hundreds of thousands of Jews and Christians from death in concentration camps. All members of the CC were ordered to protect all refugees and Jews.


Evidently do you don't know that for nearly 20 years after WW II, Eugenio Pacelli, (Pope Pius XII who reigned from 1939-1958), was respected worldwide for saving countless Jewish lives in the face of the Nazi Holocaust. Robert Lockwood of This Rock magazine said, “When he died on Oct. 9, 1958, Golda Meir, future Israeli prime minister and then Israeli representative to the UN, spoke on the floor of the General Assembly: “During the ten years of Nazi terror, when our people went through the horrors of martyrdom, the Pope raised his voice to condemn the persecutors and to commiserate with the victims.” Among the organizations praising the Holy Father at the time of his death were the World Jewish Congress, the Anti-Defamation League, the Synagogue Council of America, the American Jewish Congress, the New York Board of Rabbis, the American Jewish Committee, the Central Conference of American Rabbis, the National Conference of Christians and Jews, and the National Council of Jewish Women.”

Evidently you don't know there is an enormous cross beneath Castelgandolfo that was given to Pope Pius XII at the end of WWII by Jewish refugees whom he had hidden in the rooms, cellars, and passages of his summer residence. It's estimated that 12,000 refugees were sheltered there and 36 babies were born in the Pope's private apartment. Through diplomacy, public statements, and underground activity, Pius saved 800,000 Jews alone.

Pope Pius XII is most often accused of being silent during the genocide. Yet, he had a duty to condemn evil and he fulfilled it in language that was readily understood around the world. His first encyclical, Summi Pontificatus, condemns racism and totalitarianism. It was released only 2 months after the outbreak of the war. The Jewish Telegraphic Agency, the equivalent of the APress, described it as "an unqualified condemnation of racism, totalitarianism and materialism". The Allies air dropped 88,000 copies of it over Germany, where the Nazis would not permit it to be printed.

Orthodox Rabbi David Dalin would disagree with you. According to Dalin, food, water, sewer, electricity and communications were all controlled by the Italian government, Hitler's ally. After Italy's surrender, Hitler actually gave orders to "occupy as soon as possible the Vatican and Vatican City" and "massacre Pius XII with the entire Vatican." On the other hand, Pius possessed political influence, a world-wide audience, and all the resources of the CC and he did not hesitate to make use of these to aid the victims of the war, especially "those hundreds of thousands who...sometimes only by reason of their nationality or race, are marked down for death or progressive extinction" as he stated in his 1942 Christmas Message. (Dalin, A Righteous Gentile).

The Vatican supplemented its efforts to hide the Jews by issuing thousands of false documents, baptismal documents and passports. There was no way Pope Pius XII could have halted the Nazi butchery, but he did all he could to alliaviate the suffering caused by the war. At his death, so many tributes were made that the NY Times could not list all of them. In the SE of Jerusalem, in the Negeb, there stands a forest that was planted in acknowledgment of the Jewish lives he saved. On tree for every life...and the forest has 800,000 trees.

 

on Apr 05, 2013

 

DESADE666
That the hatred of Jews has its origin in the shameful portrayal in the Christian Bible?

Would you care to cite chapter and verse?

 

on Apr 05, 2013

DESADE666
National Socialism itself was steeped in old Nordic traditions and Norse Gods. But even if as you appear to suggest Hitler orchestrated genocide because he was a atheist (and he was never excommunicated by the Catholic Church so officially he was a Catholic if a non-practising one to the end) none of this excuses what was done in the name of God throughout the course of human history.

DESADE666
National Socialism itself was steeped in old Nordic traditions and Norse Gods.

Hmmm....I don't know anything about this.

National Socialism is Nazism. Hitler carefully studied the writings of Darwin and understood clearly the concept of Social Darwinism. Social Darwinism basically teaches that there is no moral code, our ancestors were savage, brute ape creatures that evolved through "natural selection" and in the struggle to survive, the fittest will win out at the expense of their rivals. It led to extreme nationalism, racism and warfare through Nazism and Fascism.  

Belief in Social Darwinism was a central feature of the Nazi belief system. According to Sir Arthur Keith, Evolution and Ethics, 1947, pg. 28, Mein Kampf was based on evolutionary theory. The very title of the book, My Struggle, [to survive and overcome], was copied from a Darwinian expression. Hitler believed he was fulfilling evolutionary objectives by "eliminating "undesirable individuals and inferior races" in order to produce Germany's "Master Race", Larry Azar, Twentieth Century in Crisis, 1990, pg. 180.

Frederich von Bernhard, a German military officer, wrote in 1909 extolling evolution and appealing to start another war. Heinrich von Treitsche, a Prussian militarist, called for war by Germany inorder to fulfill its "evolutionary destiny". Politics, vol. 1, pp. 66-67. their teachings were fully adopted by the German government and it only waited for a pretext to start a war. R. Milner, Encyclopedia of Evolution, 1990, pg. 59.

History confirms that during his youth, Hitler imbibed a fanatical hatred of the Jews. Based on Darwin Evolution, Social Darwinism holds that survival of the fittest applies in nature not only regarding individuals but also in the struggle between races and nations.  those groups that are hostile to the state or were biologically inferior would have to perish if the nation were to survive. These ideas shaped the policies of the Third Reich. In pursuit of his perverted vision of eugenics and an Aryan Master race, Hitler and his colleagues implemented the racist ideas of Social Darwinism and this culminated in the "final solution"--the well organized plan to exterminate millions of Jews, Slavs, the mentally demented, and other so-called inferior types.

The idea of Racism is a social consequence of Darwin Evolution. Dr. Walt Brown explains it this way. "If the molecules to apes to man idea is correct, then humans evolved up from some apelike creature, then some people must have advanced higher on the evolutionary ladder than others. Some classes of people should be inherently superior to others. that's indeed the twisted logic Hitler used to try to establish his super, Aryan Master Race and to justify exterminating Jews and others in the Holocaust.

If we evolved by "survival of the fittest" , then getting rid of the unfit is desirable. To conquer and exploit weaker people, businesses, and countries is just the law of the jungle from which we evolved. Mercy killings, forced sterilizations, and abortion while unpopular with some, would be beneficial in the long run and very logical, if we evolved.

Now to your last sentence...

DESADE666
National Socialism itself was steeped in old Nordic traditions and Norse Gods. But even if as you appear to suggest Hitler orchestrated genocide because he was a atheist (and he was never excommunicated by the Catholic Church so officially he was a Catholic if a non-practising one to the end) none of this excuses what was done in the name of God throughout the course of human history.

 Nothing about National Socialism (Nazism) was done in the name of God...just the opposite.

The philosophy called Secular Humanism is also a social consequence of Social Darwinism and that's what's in play here. If the molecule to ape to man idea is correct, then man is the highest form of being, and therefore man should be the object of highest concern, not some fictitious Creator that man actually created. If humans descended from animals, why shouldn't we behave like animals.    If nature is all there is why believe there is good and evil? After all, distinguishing good and evil requires absolute standards and Some Being to set those standards.

on Apr 05, 2013

I can assure that the Catholic Church has always warned against the international atheistic forces known as Socialism and Communism.

 

on May 21, 2013

As usual no evidence from you, little understanding of history, all so black and white and based on BELIEF as opposed to fact. To be fair you do respond to some of my points but usually based on a misreading e.g. I never wrote that the crimes of the Nazis were done in the name of God. I wrote that the religious cannot use crimes by so called Atheists (though most of the German people were religious) as an excuse or modifier of the crimes committed by religious people throughout history. And yet again you fail to respond to this point -

Finally, whilst I cannot disprove the existence of God I believe the burden of proof rests with the believer. I cannot disprove fairies, Father Christmas, the Grinch, ogres, werewolves, the Loch Ness Monster, Bigfoot or sightings of Elvis. But do I think they are real? No. Would I expect those who believe in such nonsense to have better evidence than a quote from a book written by someone who believes in that nonsense? Yes.

That's me done with this Lula. You carry on worshipping your God who creates you in sin and commands you to be healed, demands total obedience and like the Stasi is watching over you each and every single minute. As the incomparable Hitchens often said, God is like a petty North Korean dictator and living under Him is to endure tyranny.

All the best, DeSade666

on May 29, 2013

DESADE666
As usual no evidence from you, little understanding of history, all so black and white and based on BELIEF as opposed to fact.

Believe it or not, I understand your frustration with my responses. I almost expect it. The worldlings scoff at people like me who believe in God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost, constants and absolute standards, principles and truth. You scoff at me too, but at least not with a spirit of animus.

I understand because we are, afterall, in an age of humanistic atheism where man has cast aside all absolute or  objective truth beyond himself. In 2005, Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI identified this age as moving toward "a dictatorship of relativism which doesn't recognize anything as definitive and has as its highest value one's own ego and one's own desires. Relativism which is letting oneself be tossed and swept along by every wind of teaching looks like the only attitude acceptable by today's standards."

more later in reply to your last post, but home duties are calling.

 

 

 

on Jun 06, 2013

DESADE666
Finally, whilst I cannot disprove the existence of God I believe the burden of proof rests with the believer.

Fine.

http://www.newadvent.org/summa/1002.htm

Summa Theologica, by St. Thomas Aquinas, the existence of God can be proven five ways.

The evidence is there, here and everywhere. Just look around.

 

 

on Jun 06, 2013

 

lulapilgrim
Yes, tragically, people kill each other, but how much killing is really religiously motivated due to say, practicing Christianity?

What about "religion-free" atheistic slaughter from the 1900 to 2000? 100 million lives killed in Stalin's Soviet Gulag State, Mao Zedong's Communist China, Hitler's Nazism, and Pol Pot Khmer Rouge. It's indisputable that all the religions in the world put together in all of history didn't kill as many people as in the name of atheism in the past few decades.

DESADE666
I wrote that the religious cannot use crimes by so called Atheists (though most of the German people were religious) as an excuse or modifier of the crimes committed by religious people throughout history. And yet again you fail to respond to this point -

I admitted that killing has been a staple of world history since antiquity followed by a question. The question wasn't really for an answer but just to make a point...a valid, indisputable point, namely that all the religions in all of history didn't kill as many people as in the name of atheism during the 20th century. 

I'm talking about mass killing, death by atheist government. R.J. Rummel in his book, Death by Government, explored "democide", and according to his statistics, atheistic governments (Communist China) killed over 170,000,000 people in the 20th century alone. Mostly by starvation, by torture and plain out execution. Now throw in the gulags and the Holocaust.

 

 

10 PagesFirst 8 9 10